re: #9 Political Atheist

A small misunderstanding i think. I made no falsehood at all. You oppose this system which in my view gives us a fighting chance to stop an incoming warhead.

Exactly. And yet you say:

Twice now I’m more in favor of the fighting chance tools being available when you oppose them mostly.

I don’t oppose ‘fighting chance’ tools.

You oppose this fighting chance. You oppose a gun at home as a fighting chance against a violent attack in most cases, I do not for reasons we have been over and over.

Again, this is not true. I have said over, and over, and over, and over, that for those who actually have reason to fear attack, having a gun is completely defensible.

Why, why do you have to misrepresent me this way? Why can’t you accurately state my views and argue with them?