re: #2 Scout

Repeating myself from that last thread:

I’ve seen some bits and pieces here and there suggesting that this Michael Wolff fellow isn’t necessarily known for dotting every i and crossing every t, journalism-wise.

So don’t be surprised if some details of this book are found to be wrong.

and as soon as one minor or irrelevant detail is proven wrong or not fully documented, they can then throw out the whole thing.