re: #92 goddamnedfrank

Relating to that is that Newt is against an abortion exception for rape, incest or to save the life of the mother, whereas Mitt is hoping nobody asks him to take a solid position at least until the general.

It's a shame in a sense. New is the weaker candidate for sure, but if he loses he's going to lose because he's actually taken a few stands and held them. He's a wish-washing flip-flopping piece of shit, but at least he's not a wormy bag of lies whose positions are determined by a protean landscape of momentary expedience like Mitt. Compared to Romney he's a rock of intellectual (if not personal) integrity.

I can see where you're going with that, but Mittens still is a million times more ethical than the Ethically Challenged Amphibian. I don't like Mittens. I think he'd be a nightmare as president. But I'd do lots of evil if it came down to Mittens or Newt for the next 4 years.