re: #100 jamesfirecat

So he’s saying that if the fact that this very, very, very good thing happened doesn’t convince you that God was directly responsible for it and he must exists (and must be a particular version of God) then you’re dumber than Obama… if so I see where Charles is coming form.

It’s worse than that, he’s saying that this one instance of a very, very, very bad thing not occurring is proof of God’s existence.

It’s all about defining divinity downwards.

Next time a little girl is kidnapped, raped and murdered, the proof of God’s existence will be the fact that the killer didn’t cook and eat her too.

Fuck!