re: #104 AntonSirius

I’m interested because if there is a reason why this attack did more damage than the others, it might be helpful to know what that reason is.

I’m sorry, I don’t think you understood my question. I asked why it’s important for the general public to know. Obviously, it doesn’t matter in the least if I or you know the motivation was A or B. So that’s not really an answer to my question.

Obviously it’s not my job to investigate and discover that reason or reasons, but if politically-motivated obfuscations are going to interfere with the process of reaching the necessary conclusions then that is something I get concerned about

Again— I don’t get it. The policy of State and the CIA is not set by general consensus on the subject. The process of reaching conclusions doesn’t involve the general public.

99.999% of the time these days that Venn diagrams has a nearly perfect correlation, but it’s starting to look to me like the Benghazi attack is a data point that has drifted outside the overlap.

Then perhaps you can answer this, which you somehow skipped over:

Why does it make more sense, when the group that attacked had launched an attack over a video before, and they stated that the video was their motivation? What do you think the motivation for the attack was?