Comment

U.S. tells agencies: Watch 'insiders' to prevent new WikiLeaks, specifies targeting the unhappy

11
(I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)1/06/2011 2:26:36 am PST

re: #10 Obdicut

That is also not what I’m saying. And I am in no way prejudiced about you. You have posted numerous things on Wikileaks and Assange, and my views on you are based on those, not on prejudice. Please don’t use the word when it doesn’t apply; it’s a rather loaded one.

Why don’t you ever actually say that when you make your posts about me? What is it that makes you post things in a way that the easiest possible interpretation is that I should accompany all of my posts about Assange or WikiLeaks with a disclaimer that I am not in favor?

It is not some bizarre notion of mine that people make their own stance clear when they’re editorializing on a subject, as you did here. It is common goddamn sense.

Okay, fair enough: It is not bizarre (although I never said that, I just implied it was uncalled for). But you apparently misjudged what my stance was, even though it seemed “clear” through “common goddamn sense”. To avoid possible future misunderstandings, I have editorialized my recent postings about Witchcraft and Exorcism with a disclaimer so that it’s made “clear” that I do not endorse the subject that I write about.