re: #102 Sionainn

It was dismissed.

The Court further holds that the individual mandate was not a “Bill[] for raising Revenue,” and thus the plaintiff’s Origination Clause challenge lik
ewise fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In any event,
even if the individual mandate were a “Bill[] for raising Revenue,” the Court holds that it was nevertheless an amendment to a bill that “originated in the
House of Representatives” and thus was enacted in compliance with the Origination Clause

so there you go