re: #81 deymond

When you’re a hammer, everything looks like a nail. You view Jindal as anti-science, and you’ve given good reasons for your opinion, but don’t make the mistake of assuming that Jindal considers himself anti-science (and would therefore be going out of his way to mock or criticize it).

I didn’t actually say he was “anti-science,” but I think signing that Discovery Institute atrocity into law is pretty good support for that contention.

I don’t know if he falls into that category, but it’s very telling that in the whole speech he couldn’t come up with anything more specific than a slam at a relatively low-cost scientific program.