re: #109 Sergey Romanov

I didn’t miss this point and I have addressed it. Repeatedly. In this passage I merely respond to your outraged sentence.

Where have you addressed it beyond saying that someone could disagree with it? So what? People think the Earth is flat and that evolution didn’t happen also. So what! That does not make them legitimate.

The fact that you can always find some whack job to disagree with anything, does not change the fact that the culture that wrote the text, agreed a very long time ago what it means. That also does not mean that those other novel interpretations of the text are a representation of the text at all. It is only other’s takes on it. And no, before you say it, it is not as valid as the take of the culture that wrote the text in the first place.