re: #108 LudwigVanQuixote

Actually not at all in the same way. Women in my experience are no where nearly as visual as men. A scantily clad man will not at all produce the same response in women that a scantily clad woman will produce in men.

OK, there is a reason why women tend to be better at keeping eye contact in conversations with the opposite sex than men.

A woman who is dressed provocatively is without doubt being provocative.

Before reading anything into that which is not intended…

OF course that does not imply consent to unwanted advance.

However, let’s not kid ourselves. If some women were not trying to be alluring, they would wear comfortable clothing and shoes. There would not be a multi billion dollar cosmetic industry. Magazines like Cosmo would not exist and most importantly, they would not flaunt.

I am not saying that being alluring is bad either. Please don’t read that into what am writing.

I am saying that no-one unless they are utterly stupid exposes a lot of skin and does themselves up and thinks they are NOT going to get attention.

It is a woman’s right to do so, and under most circumstances, I am very happy wen she chooses to do so.

When a woman does this to try to sell me something evil though, I get offended.

You’re not a woman so you have no idea about the reaction women get when looking at a man she finds attractive and it can indeed be sexual and lustful. We size up the foot and hand index, check out the pecs or how nice he’s lookin in those tight jeans. Why do you think it’s so much different? It’s not.