re: #103 Charles Johnson

No, it shouldn’t. That was not a lie — it was a claim that has been neither proven nor disproven, and the fact that Mitt Romney got away with never releasing the returns that would have settled the matter means we’ll never know.

Sorry, but that’s way too close to the birther argument that Obama is required to prove his accusers wrong. It doesn’t work that way. Just the opposite, in fact.

If Reid had something he should have shown it. He didn’t.