Several times before before I have brought up Trumpās connection to Vince and Linda McMahon. Now questions are being raise (in light of the Vince sex-for-hush-money scandal that made him resign from his own company) whether the cast the McMahonās sent to Trump was properly accounted:
[ā¦] According to IRS filings, WWE spent a total of exactly $5 million in contributions to the Donald J. Trump Foundation in the same two years, 2007 and 2009. The records indicate the contributions came from WWE, and use its headquarters address, with no specific person named; the latest years-old comments from WWEās media relations attributed the donations to Vince McMahon and his wife Linda McMahon, personally.
[ā¦]
Tuesday was WWEās stated target date for publishing reissued financial statements and its second-quarter earnings, but instead, the company wrote the report was being delayed.
[ā¦]
The unrecorded expenses WWE states it needs to catch up on have grown to $19.6 million.
[ā¦]
Despite the IRS filings listing WWE as the contributors to the Foundation in those years, a WWE spokesperson in October 2012 said the money came directly from Vince McMahon, as opposed to the company, or both Vince and Linda. The WWE comment was made weeks before the election in which Linda was running for U.S. Senate for the second time.
Later, in 2016, a WWE spokesperson denied the Foundation contributions served as Trumpās appearance fees and that āWWE paid Donald Trump appearance fees separately.ā But this time WWE said both McMahons personally made the contributions to the Foundation. āVince and Linda McMahon made personal donations to Donald Trumpās foundation,ā the spokesperson told the Huffington Post at the time.
[ā¦]
As for the possible motivation for compensating Trump through his Foundation for performing on WWE television, doing so may have allowed Trump to avoid paying taxes, something heās made an effort to do in other cases. Likewise, claiming a large charitable donation to the Trump Foundation might have eased the McMahonsā personal tax burden in those years. Whether any of that is legal is another question.
[ā¦]