re: #114 dangerman

- his ‘logic’ is fine and im all for it - but it cant only work when there’s a surplus
- in years where all of a sudden we find we have to spend more money than planned, taxes must be quickly and agreeably increased to cover the need (ya good with that rush?)

of course not, rush doesnt understand the concept of saving for the future

Do I understand correctly that in the wingnut universe, government income and spending should be just like ours at home, except when it comes to planning for the future? It is irresponsible of us not to have money saved for emergencies and evil if the government sets aside a bit?