re: #120 justadummy

Nice straw man.

The entire concept you’ve presented is flawed. It only works on assumptions.

The first being that inalienable rights are only granted by a creator, and that they can’t be established by the will of a people, when set down as the foundation for the law of that people.

The second is that in the case of a creator those rights would be inalienable, under the assumption that a creator cannot change or decide to take them away.

That established you then assume that if both these assumptions are accurate, failure to accept them is to take a step towards dictatorship. The entire premise you’ve presented should be disregarded, frankly.