re: #123 Dark_Falcon

And the problem is that the prosecutor was unable to prove that >did not happen, which provided the cover for the holdouts.

You can’t prove a negative. That the prosecution let the defense set the narrative like that shows incompetence. But this is the same prosecutor from the Zimmerman trial, so that’s not a surprise.

“I saw a gun.”
“There was no gun at the scene.”
“Prove it!” - No…it doesn’t work that way. Or at least it shouldn’t.