re: #124 Targetpractice

The judge was convinced by a motion that cherry-picked portions of the phone calls, as well as Shellie’s testimony, and left out portions of her testimony that could have served to exculpate her, such as:

That bolded section is not in the state’s motion to revoke bond, nor is it in the affidavit charging her with perjury. And there’s no indication in the motion that that section had been cut out.

This is the second time that you’ve asserted that the State has an obligation to provide all available exculpatory information in their initial complaint affidavit. I’m not sure how many of these you’ve actually read, but that’s simply not the case. Their requirement in that document is to make their case for probable cause. You seem to be conflating the prosecuting attorney’s disclosure obligations under Brady v Maryland with their initial making of the case that a crime has been committed. Not the same thing at all.