re: #123 Obdicut
Conventional weaposn are also not ‘totally harmless’, but they aren’t considered WMDs.
My point is that only things that can cause mass destruction should be called weapons of mass destruction. If that means weapons of killing 3,000 people, then conventional bombing can be considered weapons of mass destruction.
Interesting. Just maybe that’s as it should be. Given modern “pick the window” precision weapons, as compared to say the firebombings the US Army Air Corps did in WW2, why yes those were WMD attacks. They just needed a lot more aircraft & warheads than what we might use today.
Added Edit
Great dark humor-Blowmetohelliscite
Cracked me up.