re: #132 Nyet

Logic fail. She hates Clinton because of her alleged hawkishness and sees Trump as a lesser evil.

If you can’t even come to a conclusion about a real life person with verifiable history of progressive activism in favor of your baseless CT about “rodent copulators”, then there’s not much to be said. Denial is not the river in Egypt.

Anyhoo, I got to do something else now.

I never had a reason to look into her, so no logic fail. I never heard of her.

Well, we can toss out the speculation if you like. I don’t accept the supposed logical fallacy of “no true progressive” that was thrown out at me after I called out another such person.

Any person who thinks that Donald Trump is somehow less of a “warmonger” than Hillary Clinton after all he has said is either a) not a progressive b) deluded c) a rodent copulator.

Looking at her Twitter feed, she ain’t one. Had my wife the Libertarian look at it. She agrees. (I presume a Libertarian can spot a progressive from five miles away.)

It is fair of me to say the King of Saudi Arabia is “no true Christian” and based on what I have found about this woman it is equally fair to say she is no progressive.

Non-interventionalism is not a progressive trait, it is an isolationist trait (usually associated with conservatives).

As for her real life history and verifiable information, it is the person who makes the assertion that has to provide the evidence. Telling me the equivalent of “Google it” is not evidence.