re: #118 Jaerik
Speaking of Brit Hume, you see O’Reilly had him on a few days later and asked him if what he did was proselytizing, giving him an opportunity to backpedal or rationalize, and he said no? It wasn’t proselytizing, and repeating his assertion that Tiger needs Jesus?
So it wasn’t just a simple slip of the tongue that got missed in editing. It was quite intentional and supported by Fox.
Absolutely, and Hume may be factually wrong as well. My very limited understanding of Buddhism is that it also has opportunities for forgiveness and redemption. Just like Christianity and most other religions.