re: #135 iossarian

Not to quibble, but refusing to follow orders isn’t necessarily an offense - in fact it can be a requirement in the case of illegal orders, right?

Sure. And he later claimed that’s what he meant. But the original context was about Obama being illegitimate— in fact, about Obama being a ‘domestic enemy’, and saying he’d refuse to follow any orders that came from Obama that he believed to be ‘unconstitutional’.