re: #13 Curt

How would those things have definitely prevented what happened, please? There could be another attack tomorrow on another target, and someone else might die. You can’t provide perfect security; it’s a fantasy.

The question is whether the amount of security was irresponsibly low given the resources they had to work with, and whether there was real, actionable intelligence that an attack was imminent. I have seen absolutely nothing to convince me either of those things is true.

I recall, some time back, the “What did they know and when did the know it” mantra being all the rage and demands for Administration officials to be paraded before many committees and be grilled along these lines

When was this, please?