re: #94 Honorary Yooper
Exactly. It makes me wonder if Latimer is merely grinding an axe here. Some of his claims just do not make much sense, IMHO.
That seemed to be the conclusion of the reviewer I mentioned, above. They weren’t happy that very little of the material could be verified independently, and that no such second-sourcing is done in the book itself.
Could also be that the market for anti-Bush material is larger than that for pro-Bush tomes, and that cashing in on that was the motivation, rather than axe-grinding.
Or it could be true. Unfortunately, there doesn’t seem to be any way to actually verify much of what’s written.