Current western support for Arab dictators and the associated labelling of resistance movements as terrorist organisations may not be to its best interest. Striking mutually beneficial deals with those that more closely represent Arab populations rather than with the corrupt dictators that rule them may have better long-term pay-offs.
I still can't tell -- are these people serious? Do they know they're lying, or are they just foolish in the extreme?
Surely he doesn't believe that, once Hezbollah seizes power in Lebanon, Nasrallah would voluntarily step down and allow fair elections to choose a new leader. He'd simply be the next Arab dictator.
Memo to Charles Harb: A "resistance movement" is nothing more than a dictatorship waiting to happen.
Haven't you read the history of the 20th century? Or were you too busy studying "critical theory" to notice the facts?
I still can't tell -- are these people serious? Do they know they're lying, or are they just foolish in the extreme?
Surely he doesn't believe that, once Hezbollah seizes power in Lebanon, Nasrallah would voluntarily step down and allow fair elections to choose a new leader. He'd simply be the next Arab dictator.
Memo to Charles Harb: A "resistance movement" is nothing more than a dictatorship waiting to happen.
Haven't you read the history of the 20th century? Or were you too busy studying "critical theory" to notice the facts?