re: #141 Charles

You have to prove that ACTUAL inaccurate data was produced in the real world. Not simply that it could have been, with a certain combination of code and data. That’s what I told you at the very beginning. That was the deal. Show proof of actual inaccurate data produced by the CRU code.

I’ve already read several of your very long comments about this, and in none of those comments have you ever demonstrated that inaccurate data was produced. Your criticisms have been about sloppy coding procedures, poor commenting, etc.

If you don’t prove it after such a large amount of blustering, it’s your credibility that will suffer. And I’m not going to be taken in by several thousand words about the bad procedures and processes.

Money where your mouth is.

Thanks for pointing that out.

Yes, in my long comments in the past, I was not able to back up my assertions due to your “rule” about not posting any of the “hacked” material from the CRU servers.

But since you have now given me permission to post “whatever you think makes your case,” I now have to opportunity to back up my statements with actual examples from CRU.

So, the “rules” have change, thanks to you, and I can finally take a stab at backing up my month and month of comments about this subject with some facts.