re: #142 calochortus
That bit about the āredistribution of sex [women]?ā Already been done, and in some opinions, precisely for the same reason (social stability.) Of course, we call it monogamy, but it prevents the powerful men from monopolizing women. Even if you give women free choice in the matter, there are presumably a lot of women who would see more advantage in being Bill Gates third or fouth wife than in Bubbaās first.
Heās specifically calling for redistribution of women to so-called incels to prevent incels from becoming violent. That sounds like fun if youāre a woman assigned to one of them.
Jordan Peterson has promoted this idea as well.
As for monogamy, many reasons have been advanced as to why it exists; a whole bunch of people and societies donāt ascribe to the idea (some Muslim countries, the LDS church in the past and the FLDS church now, polyamorous and polyfidelic people, &c).
I couldnāt handle polygamy. One wife is enough for me. /s
Of course incels believe they are entitled to the āhotā women, and seem to think that women are only interested in ātrading upā (which is why they are incels, they believe on their 1-10 scale they score low and women would never pick a low scoring man, so the government must step in and assign women to them).