re: #15 EPR-radar

Is there a ‘not’ missing in the second line here? The usual position is that God’s existence is not a scientific question.

If a god existed, his existence would be a scientific question. It’s just stuff that’s not real that they tell us science can’t apply to.

The early scientists thought they were studying god’s work, but the evidence let them in a different direction. If reality had been different, science would organized around the study of god instead of nature.