re: #162 Prof. Backpfeifengesicht, PhD

In order for it to be a cell phone he must have already been holding it in his hand, in fact it would take a few seconds to turn the camera on (so the cop would have seen it and wouldn’t have reacted in this way).

It is also possible that none of this happened and we’re being manipulated by the World Government. See, pure possibilities are endless. That’s why facts are established based on evidence-based probabilities, not on mere possibilities.

After watching a lot of video, it’s pretty conclusive Martin had a cell phone or iPhone in his hand before the incident. There’s also clearer video of him with earbuds in his hears.

Depending on how you set up your apps, you can start a camera pretty fast. It’s also an assumption that the cop was watching Martin the entire time and would have seen the cell/iPhone brought out and started: there were other subjects there he might have been watching.

The possibilities here are not endless and based on nothing: they are based on what little evidence we have. You believe ‘the’ gun was found and that’s it.

I’m more skeptical, so we shall see.

As before, certain pieces of information are released, but not all. Only certain segments of video purported to show proof are released, not the entire video. And the released video isn’t very conclusive.