re: #161 HebrewToYou

Bloodnok, claiming to see the future with 100% clarity is the only “bullshit” I’ve seen presented. I’m not going to argue about the science as I don’t have a dog in this fight. My concern is with the delivery of both sides of the argument. And when the side that claims to have “settled science” behind it resorts to prophecy it’s hard to get a real good understanding of the debate.

Make sense?

So if a scientist predicted that dropping an apple would cause it to hit the floor, and it’s settled science- you would doubt it?