re: #138 darthstar

It’s his blog. He doesn’t have to explain everything to you. Deal with it.

Yes it is his blog.

He explained fully why he does not approve of American Thinker, that he was deleting the link there to an article on AGW. All he needed to do was add “and the post that contained the link”.

Is that unreasonable on a debate blog ? I had posted in good faith, a fairly long post I had tried to spend care on. I was unaware that American Thinker deals in racial supremacy, I would not have linked to them had I known.

Charles has expressed irritation several times at some of my earlier posts on AGW. He thinks that ClimateGate is a non-issue that should have gone away 10 days ago, , I think it revealed intereference with peer review and raised very serious doubts about the quality and reliability of CRU programming.

Those are lesser issues. I had set out to explain why I was sceptical before ClimateGate broke. Sceptical that there truly is Global Warming - at least as regards recorded or proxy temperature graphs. And that until GW is proven, the AGW folks have not got to first base.

The American Thinker article was simply something I had seen today that reflected views I already had about AGW.