Comment

Book of the Week: Wingnuts

168
brookly red2/15/2010 5:46:02 pm PST

re: #141 jamesfirecat

Ahem…

“The principal thrust of appellant’s attack on the Texas statutes is that they improperly invade a right, said to be possessed by the pregnant woman, to choose to terminate her pregnancy. Appellant would discover this right in the concept of personal “liberty” embodied in the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause; or in personal, marital, familial, and sexual privacy said to be protected by the Bill of Rights or its penumbras … or among those rights reserved to the people by the Ninth Amendment …”

So tell me again how you can’t make a Constitutional case for Abortion? Because I believe our Supreme Court already did!

Do you even have any idea of what those words mean or are you just throwing out talking points… I don’t give a rat’s ass if you care to kill your children. I am just saying that the issue is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution and by default is a matter of states rights. That is all.