re: #176 DanielKi

Don’t remember that, but it sounds like something that could and probably should have been challenged. Sometimes the lower courts just make erroneous decisions. Intent is absolutely crucial when it comes to displaying Nazi imagery. Otherwise all historical films about covering that time would be illegal, which they clearly aren’t…

There was a big blowup that started in Stuttgart over banning clearly ANTI-Nazi images because they contained a “forbidden symbol”.

So now there is a big section of paragraphs noting exceptions to the rules and rules covering the exceptions.

Skinheads were fond of wearing T-shirts by a fictional brand called “Lonsdaple”, becuase when you wear an open shirt over it, you see the letters “NSDAP”.

So the law has been amended that it is okay to wear Lonsdaple but not to cover up the first and last two letters…