re: #16 SpaceJesus

i don’t know the solicitation laws in this jurisdiction, but basically the shooter is alleging breach of contract for grounds of the shooting. if the “contract’ was for an illegal activity, that means the contract was void in the first place, so there can be no breach.

That’s what I can’t get my head around. The only coherent argument I could see would be breach of contract on the basis of something like a stated hourly rate.