re: #181 PT Barnum

did you bother looking at the chart I referenced? The overall proportion is not nearly as critical as the $ going to the key players IMHO.

Sure enough did. Still doesn’t change the figure I gave you. In 2008, progressives got more contributions than conservative… right?

That’s the only point I was making, and it seems that you can’t simply agree that my point is valid.

Your point is valid.

Isn’t mine? Or do you think I made that up or something?