re: #30 dangerman

to start the day, remember clintons 11 hour interview, on camera?

from political-wire.com

this tweet was in the comments- do i bold it, italicize, go LARGE, or put a flashing light and siren on it?:

Susan Hennessey ✔ @Susan_Hennessey

Lawyers for the President of the United States do not believe he is capable of answering questions about his involvement in Russian election interference and other possibly criminal activity honestly and without committing additional felonies. Let that sink in.

11:03 AM - Feb 25, 2018 34.4K 19.3K people are talking about this

It is going to be incredibly interesting when Mueller finally says “fuck it” and issues a subpoena. How Trump responds to it is going to be an incredible test of our constitution. The least troubling outcome would be him testifying (not likely). The second least would be him objecting and the challenge getting run up to the Supreme Court, but given the precedent from the Clinton case in the 90’s, I’m guessing the Court would find it valid. Then comes whether Trump would still refuse (a la his hero Andrew Jackson - the Chief Justice has issued his opinion, now let him enforce it), whether he would order Mueller fired (Saturday Night Massacre II: the Stupidening), and ultimately whether Congress would do anything about it.