re: #182 Obdicut

In other words, you still cannot come up with sources which discredit the idea- and thus you find it necessary to divert attention away from tha tfawct.

As for the other papers, I submit you read them more carefully.

Given you ‘analysis’ if the Stanford paper, that might be prudent.

And yes, the Times piece was an editorial. You neglected to note that link was posted below the others, after my remark.