re: #184 CriticalDragon1177

[Embedded content]

Yes because “Obviously” checks and balances are bad thing, which explains why they were never included in our constitution. Oh wait, they were.

Right, Donald.. Sure.
And if the Senate had a 51- 49 Democratic Majority, I’m sure he’d be tweeting his heartfelt support for the age-old Senate traditions of “unfettered debate” and “necessary supermajorities” to avoid partisan obstructionism…..