re: #173 Charles Johnson

That’s not what the article says at all. I don’t agree with everything he says but it’s just false to try to paint this as an excuse for Dorner.

I guess some people have developed their own purity test over the Dorner case. When did it become a horrible left wing moonbat thing to try to understand the reasons for criminal behavior?

Go ahead, now, and accuse me of “sympathizing” with Dorner.

This is a common theme on the right, at least here, that any attempt on understanding the reasons behind deviant behaviour (as in deviates from what we accept as ‘normal’) is an effort to except the person from personal responsibility for those actions.