re: #191 researchok

You attempted to sustain your assertions with a passel of articles that did no such thing.

I am sorry, dude, but this is a big step over the line for me. You cited papers, I followed them up in good faith, and I am incredibly, incredibly disappointed to find they are not legitimate defenses of your point, and that you have been deeply intellectually dishonest in presenting them so.

Seriously, this has made me lose a large amount of respect for you. I consider what you just did to be unethical.