re: #192 Sergey Romanov

Obviously, there’s a natural attraction between these groups. But surely you can see that on the basis of mere “connections” to declare each new Anon hooliganism or crime as belonging to OWS proper is just, I dunno, utterly dishonest?

Well yeah. Obviously in this case we’re talking specifically about “anonymous” and not OWS. This hacking wasn’t committed by OWS, it was committed by “anonymous.”