re: #195 JasonA

I suppose it’s possible that a “united Israel” means something other than what it suggests on the surface. Please, illuminate me.

The If you follow the links you can find the document, it’s pretty much historically ignorant, claims that Israel is god given land and claims that Israel isn’t occupying anything. It mentions the ‘48 UN charter but they ignore that the borders have changed. It’s just a stupid proposal for the N. Carolina legislature. It doesn’t really mean anything.
As for the “United” Israel they might have been trying to refer to Jerusalem, or just referencing the country as it is today. It’s hard to tell. Think Progress and the blogger they reference spend a lot of time and effort smearing Israel and Republicans. Just because they found a historically ignorant (and meaningless proposal) doesn’t amount to much.