re: #186 Dark_Falcon

He made the claim that he could show an actual inaccuracy in the data based on flaws in the code. He’s failed to do so. He’s failed to admit it, either. He just posted one of the first ‘inaccurate code’ things to be debunked.

He’s deviated very far from his original claim of what he was going to do, and I haven’t seen anything that’s even new in what he presented. There isn’t even a new claim.

Almost everything he’s posting has to do with data before it comes into CRU, not CRU’s interpretation of the data.

I’m not going to call it dishonest, but I am going to say it utterly failed to do what he claimed he could do, and talked about doing for days.