96 million not in the workforce? After subtracting the millions who are retired, or too young to work, what’s the number @michellemalkin
— lawhawk (@lawhawk) November 4, 2016
Yeah, I wrote 96 instead of 94 million.
But I’ll wait for the non-answer. And the inevitable trolls.
Because the number includes those still in school and those who are retired - roughly half that figure.
It also counts those who are living at home - non-working spouses maintaining households, or caring for family, etc.
So, it’s a BS metric, that’s supposed to scare people, when the reality is anything but.