re: #204 darthstar

Different context of faith there. London’s posts are all passive aggressive attempts to keep people arguing about him, not AGW. It’s saccharine and insincere. If there’s anything scientific about his views, it’s that they’re faith-based (speaks of what he believes is true, cites sites that support his beliefs). Whether or not I’m an expert on AGW isn’t relevant.

wrong…the question is if you have faith…do you?, or are you an expert yourself?