Comment

CPD: Man Defending Infant Son Shoots Robber

21
Rightwingconspirator1/09/2013 4:44:19 pm PST

re: #20 Obdicut

re: #2 Renaissance_Man

The actual result is what we have. “Someone” did not hit “something’. I do not understand why you would diminish the reality like that. A man with a baby and a gun aimed at him took a shot and hit the mark. Nobody else got a scratch. You are arguing with an imperfect but successful end result here. Thankfully nobody died at all. Not much wrong with this result at all.

We can dig up many individual cases where things went right, and another bunch with where they went wrong. Lessons to be absorbed are in both columns. That way we learn from the bad, and have a chance to reinforce the better results. To me that’s important to adjust the tactics according to real world results. That is how training, education and tactics evolve to be a curriculum good enough to constantly improve results.

I admit it can go wrong. Violent attacks have that all over them like paint on a car. A gun wielding violent robber was the bad guy here.

Not the Dad.