re: #168 kynna

Between the two anti-science blocs: AGW/CC hysterics and AGW/CC skeptics, I think we’re more in danger from the former than we are from the latter. The former wants us all to DO SOMETHING even if they don’t know if it’s the right thing or if it will help — but it’s always expensive. The latter want us to do nothing, particularly at the state level. I go with the latter unless the state is interested in investing in nuclear power. Otherwise, let the market fix it. It actually will, even in a case like this.

The AGW/CC are more dangerous because they have all the political power right now.

The issue with nuclear power is the interesting one. It’s the obvious solution to AGW. An aggressive global program to convert the planet from coal and oil power to nuclear power would cure the AGW problem within a few decades. But the greens and the left continue to ignore the nuclear option. It’s about control, not fixing a serious problem.