re: #192 Aceofwhat?

quite. but if one of them is not the biological parent, they will be treated differently in family law.

i think our law is currently too slanted towards biological parents. but it is slanted. are we at least agreed on this point?

So what if the current situation is slanted, that isn’t an argument against altering the inertia of the status quo. If the precedents are wrong then they should be reversed. Again, Loving v, Virginia. Injustice doesn’t develop existential merit simply by virtue of being entrenched.