re: #213 Olsonist

That’s also not a very good argument. The present popular usage of 99% stems from OWS. Ask the next person walking down the street.

Sure. Where does OWS’s usage of the term stem from?

Why so? You don’t want to give credit. The Tea Party doesn’t want to give Obama credit. They try to divert into a complex causal analysis. That’s what you’re doing as well.

You really think that the comparison between the planning and execution of an actual military action, and the change in consciousness or thinking or attitude or whatever of a nation, are well-comparable?

The Tea Party doesn’t want to give Obama credit because they hate his ass, and can’t bear to do it, even though it makes them look like idiots.

You appear to be speculating, likewise, about some reason I don’t ‘want’ to give them credit. You can’t bring yourself to give me credit for honestly disagreeing. Why?