re: #95 Chrysicat

Well, it’ll be slightly different. Apparently the new belief is that McTurtle isn’t going to allow a single piece of evidence to be presented in the Senate and may even forbid statements—just a summary vote as soon as the articles are presented, to acquit.
The fiction will be that the House inquiry was presentation of evidence.

(Why yes, the Department of Injustice lawyers were the ones who originally floated this; why do you ask?)

How is this up to mitch? Doesnt justice roberts have a say? He will not want a sham attached to his legacy.