re: #219 harald
I don’t understand why this is getting downdinged. It seems like a pretty factual statement to me, though a congressman should probably not refer to his cock’n’balls as ‘junk’…
Its getting down dinged because it ignores the possibility that someone else might have taken a picture of his junk at some point without him knowing it.
Hence why he said that he can’t be certain that it is not his junk in the picture.
A lot of people here at LGF seem to be ignoring that fact, hence the down dings.