re: #201 Aceofwhat?

No, you said that the cause they cited as reason for their act should itself be banned, like pedophilia. So to be consistent, you now need to equivocate grammatical purity with pedophilia.

Or you can just admit you made absolutely no sense whatsoever. I’m fine with that outcome too.

Now you have the twitches. Must be really contagious.

I didn’t say that, but I realize that is what you want to think I did.

I said that certain justifications for crimes make the person particularly dangerous, and I did not use the imaginary word “banned” which you ascribe to me.